Built for 250-to-1 counsellor caseloads
Share one code with the year group. See who started, who finished and what they got, all in one place. The platform sends the reminders. You decide who needs the conversation. Scale is $199/mo and covers 200 assessments a billing period — a 380-student caseload runs across two periods or moves to Enterprise.
JobCannon for School District Counselor Caseload serves counsellors with 250-to-1 or larger student caseloads who cannot meaningfully see every student every quarter. The counsellor shares one class code with a year group; students enter it, pick a username and take the assessments without an email address ever being collected. What comes back is a single list of people: status per student (sent, opened, in progress, completed), the result attached to the name, the date, and a link to the scale scores behind it. Students who have not started are visible in the same list and are chased automatically — up to three reminder emails on an interval the school sets, 1 to 14 days, pausable per person — but only where the student was invited by email; class-code participants have no address on file. Across the cohort the dashboard shows interest and personality distribution, the careers that recur, RIASEC and Big Five averages and written takeaways, and every result exports to CSV for a board pack. Three limits stated plainly, because a procurement officer will find them anyway: there is no triage or priority ordering and no way to assign a student to a named counsellor; there is no grade or school entity, so grades are separated by generating one code each and reading the code off the result — the cabinet names a code from the assessments you ticked rather than asking you what to call it; and there is no year-over-year comparison view. Students can delete their account and data, and nothing in the platform notifies a parent of an individual result. Sits underneath Naviance or SchooLinks where a district runs both. Runs on the Scale tier ($199/mo), which covers 200 assessments a billing period — the unit is an assessment, so a student taking four spends four, and class-code arrivals are metered exactly like emailed invites. A caseload larger than 200 is staged across two periods or scoped under a district partnership.
Less chasing, not a machine that decides who matters.
Our recommended sequencing by cognitive load and planning timeline — you whitelist what you deploy.
For a school with 1,500 students and 4 counsellors
The counsellor dashboard runs on Scale ($199/mo), which covers 200 assessments a billing period plus white-label reports and the assessment API. One student costs one unit however many assessments they take, and students who arrive on a class code count the same as emailed invites — so a caseload above 200 is either staged across two periods or scoped as an Enterprise district deployment.
For micro-teams trying the platform
For solo coaches and small HR
For startups, teams and HR
For agencies, L&D and scale-ups
For high-volume screening without a contract
For 200+ person companies
Self-serve checkout via Stripe — major cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Link. Cancel anytime; 14-day money-back on every paid plan. Enterprise via the contact form below.
Tell us your school size, your counsellor caseload structure, and whether you run Naviance or SchooLinks alongside. We respond with a pilot plan within one business day.
You share one class code with the year group and let students take the assessments themselves. What you get back is a single list: every student who started, where they got to — opened, in progress, completed — and their result attached to their name, newest first. The people who never opened it are visible in that same list, and the platform chases them by email for you rather than leaving you to. Be clear on what it does not do: it does not rank your students or tell you which twenty to see first. There is no priority score, no triage queue and no way to assign a student to a named counsellor. It removes the chasing and the spreadsheet, and it leaves the judgement about who needs you with you. One practical thing to plan for at 380: Scale covers 200 assessments a billing period and the class-code page stops admitting new students once that is reached, so a caseload that size is run across two periods — year 11 this month, year 10 next — or scoped as a district deployment.
The ASCA National Model expects counsellors to demonstrate programme outcomes, not just activity, and this is a source of that evidence rather than a report that writes itself. What you can take from it: career-readiness assessment completion rate for the cohort, the spread of interest and personality profiles across it, the careers that keep coming up, and the underlying result data as a CSV. We do not generate an ASCA-formatted programme report — you or your district data lead map that export into whatever template your board expects. We also do not replace the ASCA Mindsets and Behaviors framework or the counsellor self-evaluation.
Elementary counsellors typically do not deploy career assessments — career awareness at K-5 is curriculum-led, not assessment-led. The platform serves grades 6-12, and the sequencing below is our recommendation rather than a setting in the product: middle school (6-8) runs Multiple Intelligences and Values to widen the mental list of possible futures; early high school (9-10) adds RIASEC and Career Match for exploration; late high school (11-12) leans on Big Five and Career Match. There is no grade field in the product, so a counsellor working across grades generates one class code per grade — the code stamped on each result is what separates them afterwards. Worth knowing: the cabinet does not ask you to name a code, it fills the name in from the assessments you ticked, so keep your own note of which code went to which grade.
Plans changing is normal — most students change direction at least once between sophomore and senior year — and this is the honest limit of the product today. Each assessment result is stamped with the date it was taken and stays on the student's record, so a student who retakes RIASEC in 9th and Career Match in 11th has both. What does not exist is a year-over-year view that puts those side by side for you, or any flag when a profile shifts. If you want to see movement across years you are reading two results, not one comparison screen. It is on the roadmap and it is not built.
Three things are true today. (1) The student and the counsellor see the same report — the result, the scale scores behind it, and when it was taken. Individual item-by-item answers are not exposed on the staff side at all. (2) A student can delete their account and the data attached to it, and the deletion reaches the email queue and the tables that hold a person by address, not only the ones that cascade. (3) No parent is contacted at all — nothing in the platform emails a guardian a child's result, and nothing asks a guardian to approve participation either. There is no parental-consent workflow on the class-code or invite path; the consent flow that exists in the product belongs to a separate teen programme with its own entry point and is not reachable from a school cohort. If your district requires documented parental consent, it is not met here and you should plan for it outside the platform.
Yes. JobCannon does not replace Naviance application management or SchooLinks pathway-planning surfaces — we sit underneath as the assessment-and-discovery layer. Many districts run JobCannon for grades 6-10 career exploration alongside Naviance or SchooLinks for grades 11-12 application management. The platforms do not need to integrate technically; they share the student via the SIS, and counsellors learn to use both. If your district wants to consolidate, see /compare/jobcannon-vs-naviance for the structural comparison.
Tell us your school size, your counsellor caseload structure, and whether you run Naviance or SchooLinks alongside. We respond with a pilot plan within one business day.